No flights unless you have a vaccination Passport? No job unless you have been given the Jab? No admission to certain shops, public transport or public places unless you have been vaccinated?
It seems to me that the real global pandemic we are facing is a global pandemic of stupidity and blind faith in leaders who have, so far, hardly shown that they are acting and reacting in a manner that is based on commonsense and is more suggestive of so called " health experts " ruling our countries and our leaders are, yet again, asleep at the wheel.
“There are always exemptions for any vaccine on medical grounds but that should be the only basis. " said Prime Minister Morrison back in 2020.
Perhaps he is NOT worried about the backlash of people who aren't that fussed about being guinea pigs for a vaccine and are not fans of compulsory mass medication
" I’m used to that, I was the minister that established ‘no jab, no play’,” he said. “My view on this is pretty clear and not for turning.”
No Jab No Pay (and No Jab No Play) is an Australian policy initiative which withholds three state payments – Child Care Benefit, the Child Care Rebate and, as of 2018, the Family Tax Benefit Part A end of year supplement – for parents of children under 20 years of age who are not fully immunised or on a recognised catch-up schedule, and imposes fines on childcare centres that admit unvaccinated children
Make of this what you will, but for myself, I am not comfortable about this, not one little bit.
After the Second World War, and the subsequent Nuremberg Trials, there was the creation of an International Code of Medical Ethics, known as the Nuremberg Code.
On August 19, 1947, the judges of the American military tribunal in the case of the USA vs. Karl Brandt et. al. delivered their verdict. Before announcing the guilt or innocence of each defendant, they confronted the difficult question of medical experimentation on human beings. Several German doctors had argued in their own defense that their experiments differed little from previous American or German ones. Furthermore they showed that no international law or informal statement differentiated between legal and illegal human experimentation.
This argument worried Drs. Andrew Ivy and Leo Alexander, American doctors who had worked with the prosecution during the trial. On April 17, 1947, Dr. Alexander submitted a memorandum to the United States Counsel for War Crimes which outlined six points defining legitimate research. The verdict of August 19 reiterated almost all of these points in a section entitled "Permissible Medical Experiments" and revised the original six points into ten.
Subsequently, the ten points became known as the "Nuremberg Code." Although the code addressed the defense arguments in general, remarkably none of the specific findings against Brandt and his codefendants mentioned the code. Thus the legal force of the document was not well established.
The uncertain use of the code continued in the half century following the trial when it informed numerous international ethics statements but failed to find a place in either the American or German national law codes. Nevertheless, it remains a landmark document on medical ethics and one of the most lasting products of the "Doctors Trial."
Help us cover our monthly costs
Compulsory Vaccines are in direct violation of The Nuremberg Code in my opinion
Forced, coerced, and mandated vaccination are in violation of these principles.
A VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 OF THE UNESCO 2005 STATEMENT ON BIOETHICS AND HUMAN RIGHTS
Article 6, section 1:
Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason WITHOUT DISADVANTAGE or prejudice. (caps mine)
Article 6, section 3:
In no case should a collective community agreement or the consent of a community leader or other authority substitute for an individual’s informed consent. source
Read more:
http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001461/146180E.pdf
Remember those words ‘no jab, no play’ - Morrison's words when referring to vaccinations in order to attend school. Can you imagine if the vaccine is not " mandatory " unless you want to go to school, collect a pension or get a medicare card? Catch a bus or go to the supermarket?
I find the whole situation alarming and I have still to see where there is any assurance that the vaccines being rolled out are proven to be effective and not still in an experimental stage.
While people are dying from the vaccine, I would hardly call this safe and, as Governments have absolved themselves of any responsibility should things go belly up, I wonder if they themselves know that it is still experimental?
BLOG COMMENTS POWERED BY DISQUS
