Patriot Realm

There are 3,000 architects along with investigators and leading forensic structural engineers that have proven 911 was caused by demolitions. See architects and engineers for truths site here.

They provided all the evidence to Barr and he remained silent and did NOTHING with the information. In April of 2020, Barr refused to release documents citing national security concerns.

Here is the extensive 4 year computer modeling data that brought down building 7. It wasn't fire and debris or exploding diesel, it was the near simultaneous destruction of every support column.

The report, models and 900GB of open data can all be found there.

This video should be seen by everyone. It's not tin foil hat BS. It's from the first responders that were there and engineers that have studied the evidence. It was originally streamed live on Sep 11, 2019, the 18th anniversary of the September 11th attacks presented by 9/11 first responder Christopher Gioia, a commissioner of the Franklin Square and Munson Fire District in New York. He introduced the father of Bobby Mcilvaine. Bobby is one of the victims that was killed by some sort of blast before the towers were even hit by planes. His body was in the morgue well before the towers came down.

 Here's his father giving testimony to what happened to his son

Here's the BBC video reporting on the collapse of building 7 before it actually collapsed.

Fireman describe hearing explosions

Trump shortly after 9/11 saying a plane by itself without some kind of aid should not have been able to penetrate the steel beams. He reminds people of the structural strength of the building and how it survived a bombing at its foundation.

Larry Silverstein where he says , "They made the decision to pull it"

Multiple view points of building 7 collapsing in it's own footprint with no structural resistance slowing it down.

Here is the side of building 7 that took the brunt of the damage. Surface damage along with burning office equipment was supposedly enough to bring down building 7 with the same efficiency as vaporizing every support column within a second of each other. 

At the 3:17 mark of this video, there is a building with MAJOR structural damage MUCH worse than building 7 and it doesn't just collapse neatly in on itself, vaporizing into dust. It sways and then topples over in a rolling motion. Buildings don't just collapse conveniently in their own footprint, reduced to rubble and dust within seconds with out expertly planned intentional intervention.

The first critical temperature of 600° C (1,100° F) is where steel loses about half its strength.
Steel will melt at 1510 degrees C (2750°F). That kind of heat should be able to incinerate humans instantly, how then were there testimony from survivors at or near the impact site?

Here are statements from three eye-witnesses that provide evidence that the heating due to the jet fuel was indeed minimal.

Donovan Cowan was in an open elevator at the 78th floor sky-lobby (one of the impact floors of the South Tower) when the aircraft hit. He has been quoted as saying: 

"We went into the elevator. As soon as I hit the button, that's when there was a big boom. We both got knocked down. I remember feeling this intense heat. The doors were still open. The heat lasted for maybe 15 to 20 seconds I guess. Then it stopped."

Stanley Praimnath was on the 81st floor of the South Tower: 

"The plane impacts. I try to get up and then I realize that I'm covered up to my shoulder in debris. And when I'm digging through under all this rubble, I can see the bottom wing starting to burn, and that wing is wedged 20 feet in my office doorway."

Ling Young was in her 78th floor office:

 "Only in my area were people alive, and the people alive were from my office. I figured that out later because I sat around in there for 10 or 15 minutes. That's how I got so burned."

Neither Stanley Praimnath nor Donovan Cowan nor Ling Young were cooked by the jet fuel fire. All three survived.

So if it wasn't planes alone that brought down the towers, then what did? Engineers for truth mention that thermite residue has been found in all the samples of debris they have been able to study. Thermite is NOT a naturally occurring compound it is a manufactured pyrotechnic composition of metal powder and metal oxide. When heated or chemically reacted, it allows metal to be cut through like a hot knife through butter. It turns metal into molten liquid. Interestingly enough there are pictures and video of liquid metal spewing out the sides of the building and fire fighters talking about how they saw pools of molten metal under neath the towers before it collapsed. The heat register was so high that satellites still picked up thousand plus degree temperatures a month after the collapse. 

There's also reports that there was "maintenance" going on for many months prior to the collapse. It is suspected that this is when the thermite could have been placed in key locations throughout the buildings. Here is a decent video where the work going on prior to the collapse is covered

Here is the official NIS report admitting the presence of what appears to be molten metal.

Photographs, as well as NIST simulations of the aircraft impact, show large piles of debris in the 80th and 81st floors of WTC 2 near the site where the glowing liquid eventually appeared. Much of this debris came from the aircraft itself and from the office furnishings that the aircraft pushed forward as it tunneled to this far end of the building. Large fires developed on these piles shortly after the aircraft impact and continued to burn in the area until the tower collapsed.

NIST concluded that the source of the molten material was aluminum alloys from the aircraft, since these are known to melt between 475 degrees Celsius (900 degrees Fahrenheit) and 640 degrees Celsius (1,200 degrees Fahrenheit)—depending on the particular alloy—well below the expected temperatures (about 1,000 degrees Celsius or 1,800 degrees Fahrenheit) in the vicinity of the fires. Aluminum is not expected to ignite at normal fire temperatures and there is no visual indication that the material flowing from the tower was burning."

Pure liquid aluminum would be expected to appear silvery. However, the molten metal was very likely mixed with large amounts of hot, partially burned, solid organic materials (e.g., furniture, carpets, partitions and computers) which can display an orange glow, much like logs burning in a fireplace. The apparent color also would have been affected by slag formation on the surface."

We know that government lies about diseases, the safety of vaccines, Jan 6th, Trump, impeachment, phone calls to Ukraine, FBI reports, staged assassination Whitmer plots etc.. so my curiosity is not really sated just because they say it was aluminum contaminated with burning furniture to explain the lack of silver appearance.

At the 2:10 min mark of the 7 min video above, Architect Bart Voorsanger examined one of the large "meteorite" sized objects of concrete metal and other debris that had fused together after they cooled, stating it was something they had "NEVER seen before in their lives."

Interestingly, the "official" government sponsored lead engineer of the NIST report John Gross stated there was absolutely no evidence or eye witnesses of the existence of molten metal at all in the short min video above(5:20 mark). Yet in that same video there are multiple eye witness testimonies by workers, fireman, first responders, contractors, engineers and others all reporting the very factual evidence of molten metal, dripping and running down walls, beam and rail ways. This was observed days, weeks and even a month after the collapse. Hot spots registered in the thousands 30 days after the fact.

Jet fuel, molten aluminum with carpeting in it does not NOT produce that kind of energy or lasting capability. Jet fuel burns hot and extremely quick. While a 747 is in flight, it burns about a gallon of fuel every SECOND. Once it's ignited at a temperature to sustain it, jet fuel will not last long before it is completely used up.

The presence of molten metal is a FACT. No honest person should be denying that. The aluminum in a plane should produce a silver run off at the temperatures NIST reported, but they conveniently excuse it as debris filled embers that make it look like steel. The fact that eye witness state they saw pools of it weeks after the collapse does NOT bode well for the aluminum claim.

Aluminum has greater thermal conductivity than steel and is used as the metal of choice in heat sinks and radiators precisely because of it's heat transfer capabilities. It transfers and looses heat 15 times faster than stainless steel and roughly 7 times that of carbon Steel. If the aluminum was not being continuously heated by an outside source, it would not stay in a liquid state for weeks.

Steel reinforced 500kv aluminum electrical transmission lines above the highway can instantaneously liquefy during a fault due to the tremendous heat energy produced. The temperature of an arc flash can reach as high as 35,000 degrees Fahrenheit. Literally hotter than the surface of the sun! Even at that amazing level of heat, the pools of aluminum cool within a few moments of hitting the ground, normally encasing rocks and other debris it landed on. Within a few minutes of hitting the ground, the aluminum encased sculptures left behind are cool enough to pick up by your bare hands.

The "aluminum" seen pouring out of the sides of the trade towers would not remain liquefied days after the collapse. It's thermal conductivity characteristics would cause it to bind to whatever its touching and cool within minutes.

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Patriotrealm.

This was written by poster BlmAnimalFarmFodder on a site I follow. I have his permission to repost it.  It is certainly something that makes me go hmmmm......