New Zealand’s Labour Government, which in 2020 introduced an extreme abortion law allowing de-facto abortion on demand for any reason up to birth, has been voted out of power.
New Zealand’s General Election was held on Saturday 14 October 2023; the Labour Party Leader Chris Hipkins has conceded that his party has lost the election in what has been described by one commentator as a “nightmare result” and a “bloodbath” for Labour.
Chris Hipkins took over leadership of the Labour Party after Jacinda Ardern resigned in January 2023.
Extreme abortion law introduced in March 2020
The Labour Government has been in power for six years, and in March 2020, under Jacinda Ardern’s leadership, it introduced the world’s most extreme abortion law.
The bill that introduced the law passed by 68 votes to 51 at the Third Reading – a much narrower margin than at the First and Second Readings.
New Zealand Prime Minister, Jacinda Ardern, promised the law change before being elected and has since credited herself for being responsible for the introduction of the extreme legislation, saying to reporters “Abortion law, not only did I take a position, I pursued it and changed the law in Parliament”. The law change was also strongly supported by her successor Chris Hipkins, who voted for the bill at the First, Second and Third Readings.
The 2020 law change resulted int New Zealand having the most extreme abortion law in the world, this included:
- Abortion was made available de facto on-demand, for any reason, up to birth
- Sex-selective abortion was legalised
- The previous 20-week limit for disability-selective abortion was scrapped and abortion was made available up to birth for disabilities including cleft lip, club foot and Down’s syndrome
- There was no longer a requirement that a doctor must be involved with providing an abortion
New Zealanders ignored
https://bothlivesmatter.org.nz/#public-opinion">Polling showed that the new law was strongly opposed by the public in New Zealand and in particular by women, with only 2% of women supporting abortion being available on demand up to birth, 93% of women opposing sex-selective abortion being legal and 94% of women supporting the current legal standards for abortion providers and premises.
Given the extremely low public support for the change and that the gap between MPs opposing and supporting was quickly closing, Jacinda Ardern’s Government rushed the final stages of the Bill’s progress through Parliament while MPs, media and the country were distracted dealing with the Coronavirus pandemic. This included progressing the final sitting of the committee stage and the Bill’s third and final reading through Parliament on the same day.
The Bill also saw a very large backlash from the disability community with over 1,200 people with Down’s syndrome and their families calling on the then Prime Minister, Jacinda Ardern, to keep a pre-election promise to not introduce abortion up to birth for Down’s syndrome.
An amendment hoping to put the issue to a public referendum failed in a conscience vote by 100 votes to 19 votes, denying the public a final say on the legislation.
Additionally, the Abortion Legislation Committee heard from only 139 people who wanted to give oral feedback on the Bill, despite over 25,000 submissions.
By way of comparison, the Climate Change Response (Zero Carbon) Amendment Bill received just 10,000 written submissions, yet the Environment Committee heard 1,500 oral submissions.
Sensible amendments to the Bill rejected
The then Prime Minister, Jacinda Ardern, was among 80 MPs responsible for defeating an attempt to require healthcare professionals to give medical help to babies born alive after ‘failed’ abortions.
An attempt to protect babies from sex-selective abortion was defeated with 50 votes in favour and 70 against, despite strong concerns over the practice being highlighted in a submission to the Abortion Legislation Committee from Stop Gendercide – a campaign group who had urged MPs to support the amendment.
Other defeated pro-life measures, aiming to soften the scope of the Bill, included pain relief for babies being aborted between 20 weeks and birth, stronger protections to conscientious objection and requiring the collection of abortion statistics.
Most extreme abortion law in the world
Canada is the , as their law was struck down by a case brought to their Supreme Court in 1988.
Amongst the rest of the jurisdictions in the world that have abortion legislation, Victoria, Australia, previously had the most extreme law.
The law in Victoria allows for abortion right through to birth on physical, psychological and social grounds when approved by two doctors; this can be the abortion operating surgeon and anaesthetist.
This has, in practice, allowed for abortion on demand, for any reason, right through to birth in Victoria, Australia.
Ahead of the legislation being introduced in Victoria in 2008, abortion activists claimed that, although abortion would, in practice, be allowed for any reason, doctors would ensure that the vast majority of abortions would occur only in rare circumstances, such as when a baby had a condition where they would either die in the womb or shortly after birth (a fatal fetal abnormality or life-limiting disability) – similar claims were made about the proposed NZ abortion law by abortion campaigners and MPs in New Zealand.
Data from the 12 years of the law being in operation in Victoria shows that this has not been the case. Right To Life UK’s Public Affairs team undertook an extensive analysis of published abortion data on late-term abortions in Victoria from The Consultative Council on Obstetric and Paediatric Mortality.
This data shows that since the law changed in 2008, 1,418 late-term abortions (between 20 weeks gestation and birth) have been performed, allowed by doctors for ‘psychosocial’ reasons – these were terminations where the baby did not have a disability and the abortion was performed on social grounds. In 2011, one of these abortions on social grounds occurred at 37 weeks.
Under New Zealand law previously, abortion was allowed post-20 weeks on very strict grounds (when the abortion is “necessary to save the life of the woman or girl or to prevent serious permanent injury to her physical or mental health”).
This strict law meant that abortions post 20-weeks were rare – for example 72 abortions occurred after 20 weeks in New Zealand in 2017.
Victoria has a population that is only 32% larger than New Zealand’s, but the number of abortions that occurred post 20-weeks were much higher, 323 or 348.61% higher than the number that occurred in New Zealand that same year.
Another side effect of the very high late-term abortion rate in Australia is that scores of babies have been left to die after being born alive during a number of ‘botched’ terminations.
The Victorian Consultative Council on Obstetric and Paediatric Mortality and Morbidity reported that in 2012 there were 53 ‘terminations of pregnancy’ after 20 weeks ‘resulting in live birth’.
By contrast, a 2008 report for England and Wales found that 66 infants were born alive after NHS terminations in one year. While these figures are comparable in number, Victoria’s population of 6.36 million is just a tenth of the size of the population in England and Wales.
A Channel 7 news report, broadcast on April 17 2010, reported that there had been a large increase in late-term abortions being performed at the Royal Women’s Hospital since the introduction of the 2008 Abortion Law Reform. Presenter Jennifer Keyte stated how “midwives and doctors feel traumatized” by having to perform so many late-term abortions at the Royal Women’s Hospital. Journalist Louise Milligan said that there had been some ‘alarming requests’ for late-term abortions, including a request for a termination at 32 weeks because the baby had a cleft lip.
The new abortion law in New Zealand is even more extreme than the law in Victoria, Australia – making it the most extreme abortion law in the world.
It allows abortions between 20 weeks gestation and birth with the go-ahead from just two health practitioners (this could include nurses and midwives) rather than the higher threshold of two doctors that are required in Victoria.In the New Zealand legislation, the Abortion Legislation Committee widened the already loose criteria to include “overall well-being” – making it even easier for abortions to happen between 20 weeks and birth in New Zealand. These are undefined terms and it is up to the healthcare practitioner involved as to how they interpret them.
BLOG COMMENTS POWERED BY DISQUS
